John
5:31-40 (NIV) "If I testify about myself, my testimony is not valid. 32
There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about
me is valid.
33
"You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. 34 Not that I
accept human testimony; but I mention it that you may be saved. 35 John was a
lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light.
36
"I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the very work that the
Father has given me to finish, and which I am doing, testifies that the Father
has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me.
You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, 38 nor does his word dwell in
you, for you do not believe the one he sent. 39 You diligently study the
Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life. These are
the Scriptures that testify about me, 40 yet you refuse to come to me to have
life.
NOTE: As I
understand it, a person cannot testify to himself, which is why Jesus says his
testimony is not valid. He offers up John as a human testimony, but argues
there is better testimony still. He then argues that his work, the miracles are
a very strong testimony to his claims. God the Father, who spoke out of the
clouds during his baptism, is one who does not require another testimony (the
Holy Spirit descends as a second God-witness during the same event). It is the
Father himself whose works he does and would not be able to do if his testimony
was not valid. This is the heart of the Jewish leader's problem. How can a man
do what Jesus did and appear to blasphemy as well? In the end (Matt 12), they
will give credit to Satan and his power, which violates the purpose of nearly
all the works Jesus did, since they were done for good and not evil. Jesus also
points to the scripture as another argument for the truth of his claims. He
fulfilled multiple prophecies in a manner that is far beyond chance. In the
end, all of these testimonies make Jesus' claim valid, but still, men refuse to
come to Jesus for life. The issue is not the evidence but their unwillingness
to repent of their sin and rebellion. Atheism has always been about a hatred of
moral rules and less about a philosophical position that makes sense. People
want to sin, and so they believe what allows them to sin.
No comments:
Post a Comment