Notice on a slight format change:

Except for July 2012, these are mostly a collection of current devotional notes.

July 2012 is a re-write of old quiet times. My second child was born Nov 11, 1987 with multiple birth defects. I've been re-reading my QT notes from that time in my life, and have included them here. They cover the time before the birth and the few years immediately after the birth. They are tagged "historical." I added new insights and labeled them: ((TODAY, dd mmm yy)).

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

QT 20 Dec 16, Josh 10:20-23, 26, 28, God is not required to show mercy to anyone (that is the definition of mercy)

Joshua 10:20–23 (ESV) — 20 When Joshua and the sons of Israel had finished striking them with a great blow until they were wiped out, and when the remnant that remained of them had entered into the fortified cities, 21 then all the people returned safe to Joshua in the camp at Makkedah. Not a man moved his tongue against any of the people of Israel.
22 Then Joshua said, “Open the mouth of the cave and bring those five kings out to me from the cave.” 23 And they did so, and brought those five kings out to him from the cave, the king of Jerusalem, the king of Hebron, the king of Jarmuth, the king of Lachish, and the king of Eglon.
Joshua 10:26 (ESV) — 26 And afterward Joshua struck them and put them to death, and he hanged them on five trees. And they hung on the trees until evening.
Joshua 10:28 (ESV) — 28 As for Makkedah, Joshua captured it on that day and struck it, and its king, with the edge of the sword. He devoted to destruction every person in it; he left none remaining. And he did to the king of Makkedah just as he had done to the king of Jericho.

NOTE:  What is not understood in this narratives in which scoffers and atheists use to attack the concept of the OT God, is that God is a God of justice. The land of Canaan was given over 400 years to repent of their sin. Instead of seeking God, they engaged in activities that were immoral and evil. So, God destroys what he created. First, he had a right, and two, he had a reason (although the second reason is not required by a creator). Technically he could do that to all people at any time (since all of us are guilty of sin). If he doesn't, that is his choice. We can call that mercy, but he is not required to act merciful. The only decent argument someone might make would be in regard to the children, but that makes three assumptions that the arguer cannot prove. First, life here on earth is the greatest gift, and the loss of life for no reason is unfair. Second, there is no life after this life. Third, if there is life after this life it pales in comparison to this life. Considering the fact that before men were judged to die (Eden), this planet earth was God's idea of heaven (relationships, fulfilling work, purpose, knowledge of God, etc.,), the third reason is faulty.  The first and second arguments come down to much more difficult questions. Are we here by accident or is there an intelligent first cause? Personally, an intelligent first cause, as revealed in the scriptures negates the first and second arguments. Ultimately, we all live by faith since science has not proved that life is by accident. They have proposed a life by accident, but even their theory wouldn't negate God. And they have many holes in their theory. So many, that they have created a theory called "multiverse" which postulates an infinite number of universes so that they can explain why so many cosmological constants are finely tuned in order for life to exist. That sounds like God to me. But to each faith is required. But what does the passage teach me? I exist because of God's mercy and the grace that was shown me when Jesus died in my place for my sins. I deserve to die just like the five kings, but by grace I have life, in fact something much more important than life, I have eternal life.

No comments:

Post a Comment