Notice on a slight format change:

Except for July 2012, these are mostly a collection of current devotional notes.

July 2012 is a re-write of old quiet times. My second child was born Nov 11, 1987 with multiple birth defects. I've been re-reading my QT notes from that time in my life, and have included them here. They cover the time before the birth and the few years immediately after the birth. They are tagged "historical." I added new insights and labeled them: ((TODAY, dd mmm yy)).

Friday, October 21, 2011

QT 21 Oct 11, Our hope is based on Jesus' life and resurrection


Rom 8:22-25 (NIV) We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. 23 Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. 24 For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what he already has? 25 But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.

NOTE: How do we understand evil, pain, and suffering in this world?  It is our hope of a better future.  We are awaiting the evidence of our adoption as sons.  Paul has already called us heirs with Christ, but the actual adoption is consummated when our bodies our redeemed with a new body, that will be free of the sinful nature.  Then we can stand in the presence of God without the stain of sin.  For now we can enter into prayer because of Jesus' blood, but we cannot enter heaven with our sinful nature.  That will need to be removed and we will need a new body to stand before the Father.  We don't see it now, and the world thinks we are fools to have such a hope, but we wait patiently for it.  I'm not sure what the world hopes for--nothingness seems somewhat empty; ceasing to exist in thought is futileness--but what can you hope for when you are the product of random processes.  Our hope does have a basis though.  It is based on the life Jesus lived on earth, on the sayings that Jesus gave, and on the resurrection that Jesus proved to so many eyewitnesses.  These eyewitnesses were not second generation believers convinced of a lie.  They were the true eyewitnesses who would rather die than deny their savior.  They weren't rich on earth and gained little by their faith, but they kept the faith nonetheless.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

QT 20 Oct 11, Someday there will be no natural disasters


Rom 8:18-21 (NIV) I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. 19 The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.

NOTE: Why are there natural disasters?  God never intend life to be this way, but we rebelled from his way.  In the garden, weeds were decreed such that work would be frustrating, rather than what was intended.  Likewise, creation itself was subject to frustration, not just weeds, but bondage to decay.  The planet is decaying and falling apart because of the rebellion which started in the garden, but also continues in every human being who sins by obeying his sinful nature rather than what he knows in his heart is the right thing.  But God has given hope even to creation.  Someday, when the sons of God are revealed, that is all those whose lives have been reborn by the Spirit of God, creation itself will be freed.  The planet will no longer experience natural disasters, but once again will flourish and be protected from sin.  And so, while we suffer now due to the rebellion, someday everything will change, and we won't even compare one day to the other.  Every injustice of life will seem as naught because we will see what God really intended to give us.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

QT 19 Oct 11, Not slaves--now heirs


Rom 8:11-17 (NIV) And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.

12 Therefore, brothers, we have an obligation — but it is not to the sinful nature, to live according to it. 13 For if you live according to the sinful nature, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live, 14 because those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. 15 For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, "Abba, Father." 16 The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. 17 Now if we are children, then we are heirs — heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.

NOTE: Paul says that "if you live according to the sinful nature you will die." But Paul has already said that the gift of God is eternal life with an emphasis that the gift is different from the trespass.  The difference while immeasurable in the results has more to do with the foundations (wages versus gift).  The results of the trespass are earned while the results of the gift are by definition, given (where there is no boasting).  So what is the death then of verse 13? I think it is a death that occurs here on earth, primarily physical but also with spiritual effects.  Living for the sinful nature will not bring about our sanctification, and it will deprive us of rewards that we do earn by our Christian life (we can't earn salvation, but we can earn rewards).  It does not change our status as sons or as heirs.  Spiritually, our life will fail to show much power or effect in other's lives.  At the end of time, when we cast our crowns (our rewards) toward the savior in thankfulness for our salvation, we will be empty handed with no gift to offer.  Therefore it is of the utmost importance that we are led by the Spirit and not by the sinful nature.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

QT 18 Oct 11, Legally, my status as a slave to sin has changed


Rom 8:8-11 (NIV) Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God.

9 You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. 10 But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alive because of righteousness. 11 And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.

NOTE: We are not controlled by the sinful nature nor are we slaves to sins.  We are legally (spiritually) freed from the hold over us.  We have a new owner.  And while is was not possible to please God, not matter what we did, now it is possible, because the stain of sin has been removed, and our minds have been renewed.  In olden days, when slavery was practiced, a person was a slave with little ability to change his status.  For some, slavery was forced, and for some it was entered voluntarily.  This picture is one of forced slavery.  In slavery, one is not completely controlled, and maybe that is the picture here.  We want to get out but we can't, because sin has a stranglehold on us.  Jesus death, and our faith, breaks sin's claim upon us.  We are free to serve God.  In a sense, this a legal picture.  Except for the Spirit living within us, and beginning to renew our mind, many things remain the same.  I still live in a sinful body, just as before when I was a slave to sin.  I still have the same choices.  I still choose wrongly, and at times I choose correctly, which I also did when I was a slave to sin.  But the good news is that legally I am no longer owned by sin or a slave to sin.  Jesus gives me life, and I'm being changed to become more like my savior.

Monday, October 17, 2011

QT 17 Oct 11, Those who truly know Christ will be identified by a changed life


Rom 8:1-8 (NIV) Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus,  2 because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful man to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in sinful man,  4 in order that the righteous requirements of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful nature but according to the Spirit.

5 Those who live according to the sinful nature have their minds set on what that nature desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. 6 The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; 7 the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so. 8 Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God.

NOTE: Paul's thesis is that we are no longer under condemnation, at least those who are in Christ -- also further nullify inerrant views of universalism.  The law condemn us, which was good in the sense of helping us see our sin but it could not save us.  The sinful nature took the law of God and rebelled more, so that each of us are no different from Adam, who took God's one law and rebelled against it.  The law of the Spirit of life sets me free from the law of sin and death (a reference to the OT law).  I live according to a new law with the Holy Spirit (HS) living within me.  The HS gives me a new desire, a new heart, a new life, and peace with God.  I could not please God trying to live according the OT law, but I can please God by living according to the Spirit.  Jesus summed up the law of the Spirit when he told us to love God and to love others.  Naturally, there are many implications to those two commands.  And while we will fail, because we still own a sinful flesh, we will also change, and as we submit to the Spirit, we will become more and more like Christ.  Many today call themselves Christians but are not experiencing the life-changing power of Jesus Christ in their lives.  I don't know why that is so.  Maybe they don't really know my Savior, and only claim allegiance in word.  But to those who know God, their lives are naturally transformed by the knowledge of Christ.  They are not perfect, but none can deny that they are not changing into a better person with the passing of time.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

QT 6 Oct 11, We represent Christ to a world who desperately needs him


1 Peter 2:1-5 (NIV) Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind. 2 Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation, 3 now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.

4 As you come to him, the living Stone — rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him— 5 you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.

NOTE: I am a living stone.  I'm part of a spiritual building.  I am a priest in the new covenant.  A priest is a mediator between God and man.  In the new covenant, all believers are part of the priesthood.  We have access to our Father because of Jesus' death.  We are mediators because we represent God to the world around us.  They do not have access to God because they do not have faith.  We can tell them about God.  We can appeal to God for them.  We can them how to have a relationship with God.  Paul calls us ambassadors for Christ.  As priests and ambassadors, many who carry the name of Christ, do a poor job of representing him.  At times, it would seem that God would be better off without many of his priests and ambassadors.  Father, forgive me for my failures to represent you to those around me.  Empower me to live in a manner that pleases you and rightly represents you to those around me who so desperately need you.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

QT 4 Oct 11, Baptism identifies us with Christ, but it does not save us


Rom 6:5-10 (NIV) If we have been united with him like this in his death, we will certainly also be united with him in his resurrection. 6 For we know that our old self was crucified with him so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin— 7 because anyone who has died has been freed from sin.

8 Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. 9 For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him. 10 The death he died, he died to sin once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God.

NOTE: The first thing to note is the use of the word "if."  In other words, not everyone is united with him in his death, even though he died for the whole world.  But if we have been united -- in reference to our baptism in the previous verses, which is a public identification of our belief in Christ -- then we are also united with him in his resurrection.  Baptism does not save us or resurrect us, our faith in Christ' work does that.  Baptism is an outward declaration of what God has done inwardly.  And so, because we believed, our old self is crucified with him.  The purpose (vs 6) is to do away with our body of sin.  But the use of the word 'might' suggests that it is not immediate or necessarily assured.  And the phrase 'should no longer' tells us that we have a response in order to free ourselves from sin.  We cannot affect our ultimate salvation, but we can affect our lives on earth.  Our belief in Christ assures us that we will live with him and like him we no longer need to fear death.  But as for how his death affects our lives today, the next group of verses will show that we have a responsibility for our sanctification.  Belief saves us for all eternity, but how we live our lives now will have consequences today and tomorrow (and incidentally beyond death as well).

Monday, October 3, 2011

QT 3 Oct 11, Our recognition of our depravity helps us to appreciate God's Grace


Rom 6:1-4 (NIV) What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? 2 By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? 3 Or don't you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.

Rom 5:20-21 (NIV)  The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, 21 so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

NOTE: I think verse 6:1 is in response to repeated misunderstandings to Paul's teaching (as characterized in verses 5:20-21).  Paul is saying that the value of the OT law is in making us more aware of our problem, as defined in chapter 1 and 2, and that problem is sin.  As we understand the depth of our depravity and separation from God, we begin to truly understand the depth of God's grace.  More sin doesn't make for more grace, but our realization of our "more sin" is what allows us to truly understand God's gift of grace.  Our sin is what required Christ's death.  And we have identified with that death in baptism.  What's more, the symbol of baptism, not only highlights Christ's death for us, but also our future rising from the dead in which we hope.  The more I realize how far apart and separated I was from God, the more I can appreciate the immensity of God's grace.

Friday, September 30, 2011

QT 30 Sep 11, The law added sin so that we might see ourselves as sinners


Rom 5:20-21 (NIV) The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, 21 so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

NOTE: It seems like a strange thing, to add the law so that sin would increase.  Why would God want sin to increase?  I think this is really evidence of God's mercy.  Our sin is what reveals to us our need for a savior.  The more evidence of sin, the more realization that we cannot be perfect before God.  Additionally, some things, like giving to God, coveting, filthy language, selfishness, and others, might not have been recognized as sin without the law, leaving the individual with a sense that they were not that bad after all.  The knowledge of our sin is a mercy to us.  Jesus' further definition of lust and murder, into our thought life and words, increased our understanding even more of the powerful influence of sin upon our life.  God does not desire sin--God desires that we see our sin.  And when we see our sin, that brings us to repentance and into a right relationship with God.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

QT 28 Sep 11, The gift is not like the trespass


Rom 5:15a, 18-21 (NIV) But the gift is not like the trespass. . . .

18 Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men. 19 For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.

20 The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, 21 so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

NOTE: If taken out of context, verses 18 and 19 would argue for universalism.  The structure, key words, and verbs are all the same, with the exception of verb tense.  But verse 15 says that the gift is not like the trespass.  There is something distinctly different.  The difference is not in the cause and effect, i.e., one man's actions led to many men's consequence.  Because the parallelism argues for similarity in that sense.  No, I believe the gift is not like the trespass because the trespass infected us, although technically we all sinned, so we can't blame Adam.  But the gift is not like an infection.  It offers hope, but does not demand it.  Adam's sin demanded death of everyone.  And we earned it by our actions.  But grace is a gift, it is not earned, nor is it forced upon a person.  A gift can be rejected.  A gift gives a choice to the recipient.  The gift is not a wage as Rom 3:23 describes sin.  Finally, verse 21 concludes the section and clarifies the thought by the introduction of "grace might reign through righteousness."  Here the parallelism is broken just enough.  Verse 21 says that sin reigned in death but grace "might" reign through righteousness.  Not everyone is saved, only those who respond to the  gift of grace offered to them.  Why should anyone reject that gift?  Why do people reject God's rule over their lives now?  Man wants to be his own god, he does not want to submit to his creator.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

QT 27 Sep 2011, Rob Bell is wrong, it is not true that all will be saved


Rom 5:15-17 (NIV) But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many! 16 Again, the gift of God is not like the result of the one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification. 17 For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.

NOTE: There is some current thought in American evangelical circles, that all will be saved.  It is a variation of universalism, but is essentially the same.  Some of these verses might seem to support that idea, but there is just enough qualification to dismiss it.  Verse 15 uses "the many" to describe the result of Adam's trespass, and the result of Jesus's grace.  Verse 16 says "judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation" and in a parallel form says "the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification."  Here a slight differentiation is observed.  Judgment is for every single man, and is repeated elsewhere in scripture.  The gift, though, has to be accepted (by definition of the term gift).  Judgment is earned, i.e., the wages of sin is death.  But a gift is free and only realized when accepted or taken.  Verse 17 makes it even more clear when it says "death reigned through the one man," but "God's abundant provision of grace" to "those who receive."  In other words, all mankind is affected by death, but grace is only to those who receive it.  The parallelism is useful in comparison, but there is a difference in the population that is affected.  You don't get a choice about death (unless you never sin), but you do get a choice about receiving God's grace.  While it is not possible to not sin, one could argue that both have a choice attached.  We willfully disobeyed God--we chose to sin.  We willfully choose to receive God's gift.  Otherwise, unlike the new theology of the day, we will go to hell.

QT 25 Sep 11, We don't need the law to know we have sinne


Rom 5:12-13 (NIV) Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned— 13 for before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is not taken into account when there is no law.

NOTE: What does it mean that "sin is not taken into account when there is no law?" Paul has just concluded that sin was in the world, and that it had entered the world through one man. And that death came to all men, not just because of Adam's sin, but because each person sinned. So clearly it is taken into account. I think I see it. What happened to man was not their failure to obey the law. The law did not exist. Their punishment was strictly due to their sin prior to the law's definition of sin and consequences. So the law was not necessary to condemn man. What a person knew in his hearts was sufficient to condemn him. The only thing the law did was to add additional clarity to the idea of sin.

I don't need the law to know right and wrong. It helps, but I know in my heart most sin without the confirmation of the word. The word gives me insight and teaches me about things that I might not even think are sin. But for most things in my life, my conscience tells me where I have sinned.

Friday, September 16, 2011

QT 16 Sep 11, Abraham's faith was evidenced by a belief in creation and in raising the dead


Rom 4:17 (Complete Jewish Bible) Avraham is our father in God’s sight because he trusted God as the one who gives life to the dead and calls nonexistent things into existence.

NOTE: The scriptures point out two aspects of Abraham's faith.  One, he believed that God could give life to the dead.  He had a chance to prove that many years later in his life when God called him to a sacrifice at Mount Moriah.  He also believed that God could call nonexistent things into existence.  This is the very essence of creation.  How God created man can be debated, but Abraham could not deny that the very universe itself was created out of nothing.  Paul exalts Abrahams faith on these two points: God is our creator, and God raised Jesus to life as a precursor to everyone who believes.  Of course, with power to call into existence out of non-existence, there really is nothing too hard for God.  What is a miracle?  It is beyond all silliness, the simplest of things for God.  To the atheist, if God exists, the question of miracles are the least of their problems.  And yet there is a constant theme in scripture of amazing miracles.  But the real problem for the atheist remains, where did everything come from, and how could it be so incredibly complex?

Thursday, September 15, 2011

QT 15 Sep 11, Legalism is a great danger to trust


Rom 4:13-14 (Complete Jewish Bible) For the promise to Avraham and his seed that he would inherit the world did not come through legalism but through the righteousness that trust produces. 14 For if the heirs are produced by legalism, then trust is pointless and the promise worthless.

NOTE: I like the way CJB translates theses verses.  The issue is legalism toward the OT law and it is contrary to trust.  In my opinion, it is not possible to live by faith (trust) and also live legalistically to the OT law.  I grant that a believer who is legalistic to the OT law may argue that his salvation is not dependent on the law, but that he proves his devotion to God by keeping the OT law.  There is a certain truth in that statement, since John 14:21 says something similar.  But how does one know that keeping the entire OT law is correct? And if you do not keep the entire law (which most adherents of that view don’t), why do you keep any of it?  If one can pick and choose how he shows his love for God, why can't he choose none of it (the OT law)?  But you might reply, what of the moral laws (although the OT Law makes not distinction itself)?  And I would agree, because Jesus himself taught those laws and they are what we count as the law of Christ (Gal 6:2) and the law of the spirit of life (Rom 8:2).  And so my focus is on what the NT teaches as law,  not what the OT says.  The OT provides principles and lessons to teach us (Rom 15:4).  But am I not under the burden of the OT law, I have taken on a lighter burden (Matt 11:28-30) of Jesus' commands, for his yoke is easy and his burden is light.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

QT 14 Sep 11, Wavering in faith is exhibited by a lack of prayer


Rom 4:20-22 (NIV) Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, 21 being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised. 22 This is why "it was credited to him as righteousness."

NOTE: There are a lot of good definitions for the word waver.  I think the one that most fits the usage here is "pause or hold back in uncertainty or unwillingness." Abraham was certain of God's word and he was willing to obey.  Consequently, he did not pause or hold back.  In applying this to our own lives, it can be difficult to find a promise of God that is specific to ourselves and our situation.  I'm not referring to moral commands of God, but to the larger will of God issues that are not a point (only one course of action) but are represented by a circle (many possible options none of which are sinful).  On the other hand, even within the circle of God's will, we are told not to worry, not to fear, to pray, and to act prudently.  These are things I can do without pause or holding back.  And in fact, my faith is shown by my willingness to obey God in these tasks.  So, if I am exercising faith, am I praying?  If not, I am wavering.  Am I worried or fearful about the future?  Then I am wavering.  Am I acting not planning and acting prudently?  Then I am also wavering.  The latter actions, planning and prudent decisions, are usually not where we struggle, but rather with the former actions, praying and trusting (not worrying or fearing).  Lord, forgive my for my wavering.  I am certain you know what my future holds and you will bring good out of it.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

QT 13 Sep 11, Nothing we can do will ever merit salvation


Rom 4:13-15 (NIV) It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who live by law are heirs, faith has no value and the promise is worthless, 15 because law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.

NOTE: Abraham was declared righteous long before he was circumcised and more than 400 years before the law was given.  It was with Abraham that God established the Abrahamic covenant which guaranteed that out of Abraham's seed, the entire world would be blessed.  Abraham was also declared righteous, not on the basis of anything he did, but on the basis of faith.  He believed in God and so God declares him righteous.  And as a result Abraham becomes a symbol for all people of how one gains righteousness before God--it is based only upon one's faith.  There still remains the issue of justice, the payment for sins, but Jesus would later satisfy God's judgment against sin by taking all of mankind's sin upon himself at the cross. 

There is a tendency in man to believe he has to earn something to claim it.  And most of the time, that is a right way to feel.  But when it comes to salvation and righteousness before God, it is not possible to earn it.  And the desire to earn it becomes the very barrier to achieving it.  To receive righteousness, we must come to God humbly and admit that there is nothing we can ever do to merit his favor to counteract the sins we have done.  The only answer is to humbly accept the free gift offered in faith, believing that God did all the work necessary for our salvation.  Oh how freeing, to be completely accepted and never to worry about where we stand.  Thank you God!

Friday, September 9, 2011

QT 9 Sep 11, Homosexuality is the second stage in the descent into the pit


Rom 1:24-27 (NIV) Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator — who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

NOTE: Verse 26 is the second of three "God gave them over" phrases and describe the descent into the gutter--greater and greater degrees of sin.  In this case, sexual lust and permissiveness (verse 24), and the passion for things they create (verse 25), causes God to give them over to shameful lusts.  It is not just 'lust,' as seen in the preceding verses, but shameful lusts.  Shameful means to give offense to our moral sensibilities and to injure our reputation (thefreedictionary.com).  We call these shameful acts, homosexuality.  It was not the way God created us.  And by the way, the research that we are born this way is very questionable.  None of the studies have been repeated.  But, actually, it would make sense that our DNA structure would have a same-sex gene, since sin has caused a decay in God's originally perfect creation (Rom 8:20, 21 (NIV) For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.)  Our rebellion in the garden started a process that has not only destroyed ourselves but destroyed the very world created for us.  We were not created to die; we were not create to live without God; and we are not served by our rebellion to God.  The hope, for those who repent and turned to God through Jesus Christ, is the liberation from our bondage and decay.  We think we are free because we can choose to sin, but we don't even know what real freedom feels like, because we are so much in bondage to our sin.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

QT 7 Sep 11, Evil is our lot for choosing sin over God


Rom 1:24-25 (NIV) Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator — who is forever praised. Amen.

NOTE: This is the first of the three "God gave them over" phrases that describe the downward cycle of sin.  This first usage follows the worship of images despite evidence to the contrary.  The Greek word for "gave up" is paredooken and is an intensified form of the word "give," suggesting a person in possession of something, transferring it to another.  God, who has a personal interest in our well-being and protection transfers his possession to what we wanted, which was the sinful desires of our heart.  The result of this new phase (second stage) is no longer just giving thanks and worship to images, but worshipping and serving create things.  Our lusts become our gods.  In this stage, men also exchange truth about God for a lie.  Today, our land is full of lies about God because we do not want to know the truth.  We are our own enemies.  Rather than shaking our fists at God for not protecting us from evil or disaster, we should realize that it was our own rebellion that causes God to give us over to what we truly wanted.  God is very good.  The evil in the world does nothing to dispel that truth.  It only amplifies our poor choice!

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

QT 6 Sep 11, A refusal to acknowledge God is the first step in futility


Rom 1:21-25 (NIV) For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator — who is forever praised. Amen.

NOTE: Paul writes that men knew God.  I wonder if that was during the time after Adam and before Noah.  I'm not sure how they knew or when they knew, but they did know God.  And even though they knew him, the first two mistakes was not to glorify him or give him thanks.  For the believer, this is the heart of worship, and based on this verse alone would seem to be our primary purpose in life.  Because when we fail to worship God, it starts a chain of effects that are disastrous for us.  Worship is for our good, and when we do not worship, the first area affected is our thinking, the second area is our emotions.  Their thinking became futile.  A definition for futile, is that it serves no purpose, and it is occupied with trifles.  Secondly, our foolish hearts were darkened.  That which should have captured our attention and emotions was obscured and unclear.  And so, we no longer knew God, because we couldn't see him anymore.  And it all started because we refused to worship.  We didn't exalt God for who he is and we did not thank him for what he has done.  And as the passage will continue, we are the recipients of our own choice.

Monday, September 5, 2011

QT 5 Sep 11, All men are without excuse for not recognizing God's existence


Rom 1:17-20 (NIV) For in the gospel a righteousness from God is revealed, a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written: "The righteous will live by faith."

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities — his eternal power and divine nature — have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.


NOTE: God has revealed two things to us, verse 17 purports of  "a righteousness from God" and verse 18 of "the wrath of God."  A righteousness appears as a gift since it is from God.  It is obtained by faith in all cases.  The phrase "first to last" could mean status or could be referencing the two major covenants, but the phrase is still quite clear.  The only way to obtain "a righteousness from God" is by faith.

The wrath of God, also revealed to us (verse 18), suggests a trait, since it is of God.  It is not necessarily a gift since it is being revealed against men who are godless, wicked, and suppress the truth.  God says that what may be known about him is plain.  God says that he has made it plain.  Plain has a number of meanings, but here the meaning is that it is obvious and clear.  What is plain are God's invisible qualities--those which would seem to be not clear since they are invisible--his eternal power and divine nature.  God says they are clear from creation and are understood from creation.  Therefore, at judgment time, God will tell men that they are without excuse.  Apparently those who argue that what is clear to them--random process of nature to create life out of immaterial matter--will be an insufficient argument in God's eyes.  They will be charged with suppressing truth, because creation is obvious and clear.

God seems to be using the teleological argument or argument by design.  The complexity of life argues against creation by random forces.  Mathematically, the probability for even the simplest cell to form by random forces is astronomically low.  But, men would prefer to believe in chaotic elements than to believe in God, and so they suppress the truth and are without excuse.